Feminist Fun Police

I post a lot of links but I never ever read the comments section on anything so I wouldn't read the comments on anything I post. Just to be on the safe side.

May 16, 2013 at 9:08pm
10,560 notes
Reblogged from mycypherkeepsmoving
queereyes-queerminds:

lostruth:

Power Structure of Oppression

Yes. Yes. YES. 

queereyes-queerminds:

lostruth:

Power Structure of Oppression

Yes. Yes. YES. 

(Source: mycypherkeepsmoving, via indivisiblestring)

May 15, 2013 at 9:56pm
17,392 notes
Reblogged from bostonreview

You mean the generation that paid three times as much for college to enter a job market with triple the unemployment isn’t interested in purchasing the assets of the generation who just blew an enormous housing bubble and kept it from popping through quantitative easing and out-and-out federal support? Curious.

— When comments are better than the article, Atlantic edition (“The Cheapest Generation: Why Millennials arent’ buying cars or houses, and what that means for the economy”)

(Source: bostonreview, via coleytangerina)

9:53pm
5,307 notes
Reblogged from clementinevonradics

I know
you and I
are not about poems or
other sentimental bullshit
but I have to tell you
even the way
you drink your coffee
knocks me the fuck out.

— :3 (via dentate)

(Source: clementinevonradics, via reflcopter)

9:45pm
1,640 notes
Reblogged from kiriamaya

Trans men are MEN. Not special edition sparkly vampire fluffy unicorn womyn-space-compatible men-lite. It is utterly, utterly, utterly fucked up to even suggest that they should be allowed in womens’ spaces, especially at the expense of trans women.

— freedominwickedness (via kiriamaya)

(via genderfork)

12:54pm
12,442 notes
Reblogged from heymonster

heymonster:

Someone requested a post of all of the current Strong Female Characters, so here you go.

prints are available here.

(via feminerds)

12:53pm
15,906 notes
Reblogged from deductioneers

image

(Source: deductioneers, via obscenepromqueen)

May 9, 2013 at 10:39pm
69 notes
Reblogged from rgr-pop

MSG has been used for more than 100 years to season food. During this period, extensive studies were conducted to elucidate the role, benefits and safety of MSG. At this point, International and national bodies for the safety of food additives consider MSG safe for human consumption as a flavor enhancer. The “MSG symptom complex” was originally termed as the “Chinese restaurant syndrome” when anecdotally Robert Ho Man Kwok reported the symptoms he felt after an American-Chinese meal. Kwok suggested multiple reasons behind the symptoms, including alcohol from cooking with wine, the sodium content, or the MSG seasoning. But MSG became the focus and the symptoms have been associated with MSG ever since. The effect of wine or salt content was never studied.

— Anyone who hates MSG is a racist and an enemy of savory. Never to be trusted. (via rgr-pop)

(via takemetoponyisland)

6:27pm
3,702 notes
Reblogged from thugzmansion
bigfatfeminist:

myloveinthug:

WILLOW oh my god

!!!!1

bigfatfeminist:

myloveinthug:

WILLOW oh my god

!!!!1

May 7, 2013 at 10:45pm
145 notes
Reblogged from imnotcaradelevingne

Consider the following Coalition policies:

■ Lower the tax-free threshold from $18,200 to $6000. This will drag more than one million low-income earners back into the tax system. It will also increase the taxes for 6 million Australians earning less than $80,000.
■ Abolish the low-income superannuation contribution. This will reimpose a 15 per cent tax on superannuation contributions for people earning less than $37,000.
■ Abolish the proposed 15 per cent tax on income from superannuation above $100,000 a year. The combined effect of these two superannuation changes is that 16,000 high-income earners with superannuation savings in excess of $2 million will get a tax cut while 3.6 million workers earning less than $37,000 will pay more than $4 billion extra in tax on their super over the next four years.
■ Abolish the means test on the private health insurance rebate. This will deliver a $2.4 billion tax cut over three years for individuals earning more than $84,001 a year, or couples earning more than $168,001. People on lower incomes will receive no benefit.
■ Introduce a paid parental leave scheme that replaces a mother’s salary up to $150,000. To put it crudely, this means a low-income mum gets about $600 per week while a high-income mum gets close to $3000.
■ Abolish the means-tested Schoolkids Bonus that benefits 1.3 million families by providing up to $410 for each primary school child and up to $820 for each high school child.

These policies will result in low- and middle-income earners paying billions of dollars more in tax while those on higher incomes receive billions in tax cuts and new benefits. Rather than take from the rich and give to the poor, the Coalition policies are a case of take from the poor and give to the rich. And this remains the case even taking into account the flow-on effects of the abolition of the carbon price and the funding of the Coalition’s paid maternity leave through a tax on big companies.

So who is waging the real class war? And why is it that Coalition MPs are the ones who most frequently level the accusation of ”class warfare”?

— 

Nicholas Reece, Abbott, not Gillard, is the true “class warrior”, SMH (via imnotcaradelevingne)

Looking forward to my one year of tax returns with the new tax free threshold!! :D

(via clambistro)

I haven’t really kept up on the coalition policies for this election so cannot confirm these but it may be of interest to those of you who vote.

(via sophieag)

(via sophieag)

10:39pm
4,460 notes
Reblogged from edwardspoonhands
edwardspoonhands:

I was on conference calls all day today, which I sometimes find is a very good time to mess around in illustrator. 

edwardspoonhands:

I was on conference calls all day today, which I sometimes find is a very good time to mess around in illustrator.